waalaalaaalaaaa

ahhhh.
so freaking irritating.
i am insulted by untrue insults.
thats super duper loser.
oh well i AM a loser.


stuuuupiiiidddddd.
i need long-sightedness.

well well well.
i think the exposition we did during english was really cool.
but i think its all a matter of point of view.

yah well but some people just absolutely condemn other people's point of view.
but if you would like to put it that way.
everyone is free to air her on views and explain why she supports it.
so indirectly it is promoting that way of thinking.
which is often percieved as condemnation of other points of view.
which is totally what i am doing.
oh wow.
so its just called airing ones opinions and not being close minded?
as in like if people write stuff about why they think something is wrong,
and say how stupid/evil etc some ppl are to do it,
is it voicing her view or being close minded.
it all comes back to pov!
like how you might write about how stealing is so bad and condemn it,
but that is just what you percieve to be morally wrong.
what if some people do not think stealing is morally wrong.
they are not immoral cos the morality of stuff is dependent on pov and different ppl have different criterias to what they think is morally right.

so is it wrong to condemn an idea which is widely thought to be morally wrong?
realistically, it is just what majority thinks which counts what.
like if someone says stealing is okay,
society will jus say he/she is siao and just condemn it.

so is it mean of someone to condemn other ppl's point of view if 99% of the world condemns it too?
i guess im just another hypocrite and if i dint disagree with whatever was said i would just have promoted it which in other words would be condemning the other point of view.
right?

so basically i guess this is a round about thingy which im writing.
i guess everyone has her right to her own pov so whether they want to condemn it or not its just a reality and since i cant do anything about it,
i should just REN3!

ren3-ing is super useful!
i managed to ren3 a lot of stuff yay!

okay...
but oh yah this isnt what the exposition is about but this is basically the main concept im figuring out.
the main idea of the exposition is what the author defines as being lady-like and what is being polite.
its her pov i guess.
but its really food for thought lah.
the thousand and one implications of what she says and all.
right...feminism indeed.

and in the end theres just no conclusion is just another open ended topic which i will forget rather soon.
blegh.
i guess theres no conclusion but its just up to the individual to make her own stand.
wow!
so the author has made her stand and basically is just sharing it with the wrld so she isnt wrong?
ahhhh.
i am thinking in an absolutely illogical manner.

why am i so dumb.
stupidity is irritating.
no wonder im so freaking irritated.

and i dont believe people can die without regrets.
only someone with no yearnings or greed can do so.
and all humans have yearnings so its impossible!